Talk:Springleaf MRT station/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: The Most Comfortable Chair (talk · contribs) 03:55, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello. I will review this. — The Most Comfortable Chair 03:55, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * @The Most Comfortable Chair Heyoo, are you gonna review this? ZKang123 (talk) 04:07, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Apologies for the delay; I will complete the review by the end of this week. — The Most Comfortable Chair 06:31, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

have you gotten too comfortable in your chair? I can take over the review if you'd like :) Kingoflettuce (talk) 23:03, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm assuming Mr Chair will come back to this but just a quick comment from me: you'd probably want to change some of the refs to show that the journo's last name is Toh, not Wei Kingoflettuce (talk) 23:06, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Life has been a little too much lately, but I sure do have my comfortable chair at the end of the day. You made my day with that, . :) — The Most Comfortable Chair 08:39, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Lead

 * "Near the station Tagore MRT Station." — I am not sure I understand what this means.
 * Must be some foamer or vandal... Removed it since it's not yet in official records.

History

 * It is somewhat moot to have "Thomson–East Coast line" as a sub-section header since it encompasses all of "History".
 * Done.--ZKang123 (talk) 09:22, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Is it possible to link "bored tunnel" to an relevant article?
 * Linked to Tunnel boring machine.--ZKang123 (talk) 09:22, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * "Cranes and heavy machinery have to be carefully installed," → "Cranes and heavy machinery had to be carefully installed,"
 * Fixed.--ZKang123 (talk) 09:22, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * "The government agency gave regular updates on the construction works to residents and shopkeepers in the area." — I am not sure if this fact needs to be included in the article. Since that much would be expected with pretty much any major project, I see little encyclopediac value to it.
 * Fixed.--ZKang123 (talk)

Station details

 * The header could just be "Details" since mentioning "Station" is a little redundant.
 * Fixed.--ZKang123 (talk) 09:22, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * "Thomson–East Coast line (TEL)" → "TEL" — Since it has already been abbreviated in the preceding section.
 * I thought it's better to abbreviate at every section. But fixed accordingly.--ZKang123 (talk) 09:22, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * "Being part of the TEL, the station is operated by SMRT Trains. Train frequencies on the TEL range from 5 to 9 minutes." — I would suggest you merge these sentence to avoid too many short sentences in one paragraph.
 * Fixed.--ZKang123 (talk) 09:22, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Since it is not mentioned elsewhere in the prose, it should be mentioned that Springleaf MRT station is a "Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) station" in this section.
 * Fixed.--ZKang123 (talk) 09:22, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Final
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it well written?
 * A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
 * B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * 1) Is it verifiable with no original research?
 * A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
 * B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons&mdash;science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
 * C. It contains no original research:
 * D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
 * B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Succinct and concise, the article is referenced to reliable sources and illustrated appropriately. It meets the criteria. Thank you for your work. — The Most Comfortable Chair 13:47, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Succinct and concise, the article is referenced to reliable sources and illustrated appropriately. It meets the criteria. Thank you for your work. — <b style="color:#000000">The Most Comfortable</b> <b style="color:#8A2BE2">Chair</b> 13:47, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Succinct and concise, the article is referenced to reliable sources and illustrated appropriately. It meets the criteria. Thank you for your work. — <b style="color:#000000">The Most Comfortable</b> <b style="color:#8A2BE2">Chair</b> 13:47, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Succinct and concise, the article is referenced to reliable sources and illustrated appropriately. It meets the criteria. Thank you for your work. — <b style="color:#000000">The Most Comfortable</b> <b style="color:#8A2BE2">Chair</b> 13:47, 26 March 2022 (UTC)