Talk:Spruce Production Division/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

I'll review this article now. Reviewer: Nick-D (talk) 03:08, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Comments
This is an excellent article. My only suggestions for further improvements are:
 * It's stated both that total production of lumber for aircraft increased to 22,145,823 board feet and that the division produced "54 million board feet of spruce for aircraft construction from Oregon forests alone" - this seems contradictory
 * The lead could be expanded to a couple of paragraphs
 * Did the 'company town' in Washington State have a name?
 * Were all of the division's personnel volunteers, or were draftees assigned to the unit? Nick-D (talk) 03:18, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Assessment

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

Nick-D (talk) 03:21, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: