Talk:Squatting in Ukraine/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Viriditas (talk · contribs) 09:10, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Prose

 * Minor copyedits. Please review. Viriditas (talk) 10:37, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Review

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * The only issues I noticed were related to prose quality. NPOV is difficult to gauge due to the political situation, but I assume it is neutral.  I made very minor edits to the prose linked above.  Please review. Viriditas (talk) 11:02, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the edits and the review! Mujinga (talk) 11:25, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * The only issues I noticed were related to prose quality. NPOV is difficult to gauge due to the political situation, but I assume it is neutral.  I made very minor edits to the prose linked above.  Please review. Viriditas (talk) 11:02, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the edits and the review! Mujinga (talk) 11:25, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the edits and the review! Mujinga (talk) 11:25, 3 January 2022 (UTC)