Talk:Srebrenica

Lead
I've removed the part about the state of economy during communist Yu, it was unsourced. Everything else is sourced and factually correct. Do expand and make other tweaks if you have the time.  Sadkσ  (talk is cheap)  17:09, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I didn’t see any citations for the other parts too that why I removed your new additions. I agree that the section should be expanded but we need to cite the claims. Even if we think it’s obvious or common sense or personally know as a fact. Lets try to track down some RS for this. I will look into this and help. I am busy in RL at the moment so can pop in randomly. Thanks. OyMosby (talk) 17:58, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Which parts? Be precise please. All of it is sourced.  Sadkσ  (talk is cheap)  18:12, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I couldn’t track this down in the article? Unless I missed it? Its about listing all the various entities that controlled Sebrenica at different times. We need a source confirming. I was trying to fund in the body where the new intro content was based on but could see anything. So from that a citation would be good after that content is stated I figured. OyMosby (talk) 18:16, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Check out ref. no. 5 and see Banate of Bosnia and Kingdom of Bosnia. It is also stated here but I'm not sure if that is a RS. I do not have the time to go the library at the moment.  Sadkσ  (talk is cheap)  19:36, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Noted, I will look into it or hopefully anyone else can help us here. Kingdom of Croatia at one point also had reign at one point as well it seems. But this a map, we need books confirming all of this for the sake of the article. RL is getting more and more hectic for me. So free time is ever shrinking.  :/ OyMosby (talk) 19:56, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Okay. It seems that several new references have been introduced. I've added 1 or 2 references before as well. The article is, sadly, in a poor shape. I searched a bit about economy of the town, but there are little reliable sources available online. Do you have a version of the lead which you would consider to be an improvement?  Sadkσ  (talk is cheap)  21:23, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Just as long as everything can be traced to RS citations. I will get back on a version when I can find sources and ......... time. Things have gotten very busy in life lately. Cheers OyMosby (talk) 22:20, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

"British Army documents declassified in 2019"
This needs editing. As it stands it represents original research, referring to a 210 page folder at The National Archives.31.45.31.233 (talk) 17:06, 8 June 2021 (UTC)