Talk:Srettha Thavisin

Prepare for splitting?
The Wikipedia article on Srettha Thavisin has seen recent growth due to the addition of new content. This expansion prompts me to question regarding the section titled “Srettha Thavisin”. The query is whether this section is disproportionately large or if it receives undue emphasis in his biography entry. My concern arises from the fact that this particular section takes up a substantial part of this article. Given the likelihood of future expansion, my question is whether there should be a consensus on the need to prepare for splitting the content. Thank you. Bossza007 Here (talk) 05:10, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Assessment - B-Class article

 * B-class review

JoeNMLC (talk) 20:46, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) It is suitably referenced, with in-line citation:
 * 2) It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious holes:
 * 3) It has a defined structure:
 * 4) It is reasonably well-written:
 * 5) It contains supporting materials where appropriate:
 * 6) It presents its content in an appropriately understandable way:
 * 7) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It contains supporting materials where appropriate:
 * 2) It presents its content in an appropriately understandable way:
 * 3) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: