Talk:Sridevi: The Eternal Screen Goddess/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: PinkElixir (talk · contribs) 13:59, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I can pick up this review. I'll have it done soon. Kind regards~ PinkElixir (talk) 13:59, 7 January 2022 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * The prose, spelling, and grammar is of acceptable quality. I made some wording edits (mostly fixing grammar) while conducting the review. The article generally follows MoS for word choice, lead, layout, etc.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * The article has both a References and Sources section, both of which contain WP:RS. URL's to sources lead to reliable news sources.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * The article covers an appropriate summary of the book, from Nayak's conception of the idea through the writing process and critical reception.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * The article follows WP:NPOV.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * There is no indication of edit wars in the edit history or on the article talk page.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * The image used is under a fair use license.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Apologies for the delay, but great work! Cheers~ PinkElixir (talk) 00:17, 16 January 2022 (UTC)