Talk:Srinath Raghavan

Perry Anderson
What's the relevance of the author here? We can find better references right? My Lord (talk) 14:09, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Thats not a good objection to a critique from such a prominent historian. So the question that you ought to ask is "why can't we have his critique of Raghavan here?" Its certainly more worthy, judging by the number of cites on Google Scholar, than most of the others who have been cited on the article. Whats the motive behind removing the scholarly criticism? That is against WP:NPOV. It may even be a BLP violation.DarSahab (talk) 15:59, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * First off, let me say that I mixed up this Perry Anderson with somebody else. I think my objection was suitably answered by.
 * However, now that I look at the book and the so-called critique of Raghavan there, I continue to have concerns. Let me do a bit more reading and get back here with more comments. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 16:16, 15 June 2018 (UTC)