Talk:St. Anger/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hi, I am reviewing this article for GA and I will leave some comments below. &mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 00:21, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * This is a very good article. I actually understood it, even though I know nothing about Metallica. The pictures, references and organization are good.
 * The only complaint I have is in the lead. Although it becomes clear in the body of the article, in the lead is is unclear that Robert Trujillo played only on the tour and not on the album.
 * I copy edited a few things for wording and punctuation. Feel free to revert if you do not like the changes I made.

&mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 00:21, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for the review. And your one complaint is taken care of. :D Woo! I just wrote the article for the most hated album in metal! Burningclean [speak]  01:29, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Final GA review (see here for criteria)

Congratulations!
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): Well written b (MoS): Follows MoS
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable  c (OR): No OR
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): Sets the context b (focused): Remains focused on subject
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias: NPOV
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

&mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 01:43, 7 February 2009 (UTC)