Talk:St. Johns River/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * 1) It is  well written.
 * a (prose): a (MoS):


 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) A few red links. Symbol possible vote.svg
 * 2) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):

Overall: Pass. Secret Saturdays (talk) 21:20, 11 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the review. --Moni3 (talk) 21:35, 11 October 2009 (UTC)