Talk:St. Michael's Golden-Domed Monastery/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sawyer-mcdonell (talk · contribs) 00:10, 5 January 2024 (UTC)


 * @Amitchell125 hi! just pinging you to this review, to see if we can get these bits addressed & promote the article :) sawyer  * he/they *  talk  17:47, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Will do. Have you finished your comments? Amitchell125 (talk) 18:10, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Yep! Sorry if that wasn't clear haha sawyer  * he/they *  talk  18:11, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

2A (citations)
Hi, when you say in your review comments "...perhaps the citations could be organized better? They're a bit hard to parse through as it is.", could you explain what the issue is a little more? The citations are done in what I thought was a standard way. Regards, Amitchell125 (talk) 20:36, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * There's no MOS issues or anything that I think is an actual problem, and the citations themselves are excellent. There are just quite a lot of items in the "Sources" section and I think it might be beneficial to the reader to break it up into subsections, perhaps "Books", "Journal articles", etc. This is just a suggestion on my part, as a reader, rather than necessarily a requirement as a GAN reviewer. I know you've got a lot of experience with the GA process (and I do not), so feel free to push back on me here! sawyer  * he/they *  talk  21:22, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Now organised by language, as it's the English Wikipedia. Hopefully this will be a help to interested readers. Amitchell125 (talk) 08:50, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Issues addressed
Hi, the issues you have identified are now I hope addressed. Regards, Amitchell125 (talk) 08:51, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Looks great! Thanks :) sawyer  * he/they *  talk  19:36, 9 January 2024 (UTC)