Talk:St. Peter's Church, Straubing

GA Nominee

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
 * 1) It is stable.
 * 2) It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
 * a (tagged and captioned): b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * 1) Overall:
 * a Pass/Fail:
 * a Pass/Fail:

The question marke in 1a is only because the tone of the article isn't quite boring enough. Though everything in it is well sourced, it reads a bit like an original analysis. That could probably be toned down, but I think it passes as it is. Atropos 18:25, 26 June 2007 (UTC)