Talk:St. Thomas Aquinas High School (Ohio)

Main
The article was rewritten using my own personal knowledge of St. Thomas Aquinas High School as an alumnus of that school. Several of the facts I wrote are also present on the official school website, but they are all also general knowledge among the school's students, parents and alumni. So, I don't believe there is any copyright problem in this article whatsoever. Please point out to me what is illegally copyrighted material included in this article and I will remove it. I will do whatever is necessary to allow an article on this St. Thomas Aquinas High School to be posted on Wikipedia. It seems that my article is no different than a similar article posted regarding St. Xavier High School in Cincinnati Ohio, and that article was allowed..

Move
I'm going to write an article on the St. Thomas Aquinas high School in Fort Lauderdale. Its achievements seem very notable. I think that both articles should append "in (their city)" so that both can coexist. Would such a move be okay with those involved with this article? → St. Thomas Aquinas High School in Louisville.Kushboy 00:05, August 10, 2005 (UTC)

Incorrect
I deleted the line about the school requiring community service for graduation. I am currently a senior at St. Thomas, and no such requirement exists. Starsquare16 16:51, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Infobox
Someone should make an infobox for the school, since the article contains quite a bit of sufficient info to be put into it. -- Dan Leveille TALK 03:52, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

and here is your infobox
i also posted this on the school's main page  enjoy  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drewy747 (talk • contribs) 04:36, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:St. Thomas Aquinas High School (Ohio) seal.jpg
Image:St. Thomas Aquinas High School (Ohio) seal.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:56, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Cleanup
I removed quite a bit of stuff from the article as it was loaded with copyrighted and unreferenced material. The entire section on the seal was a cut-and-paste from the school's website. Not only is that a copyright violation (even with a link to the website), but it's in violation of Wikipedia's "Not a Mirror" policy. Also, unless the seal has been covered in the media somehow, it really doesn't need an entire section of its own in an article like this. If it has some significant history behind it, it can easily be included in a history section if needed. Next, there were lots of "was well known" or "is known for". Remember, Wikipedia is for a worldwide audience, so few outside (and not everyone inside) "knows about" this school for their sports or academics, or whatever. When a statement like that is made it needs to come from a reliable third-party source. Most times, schools are somewhat known locally for certain things, but once you leave that small geographic area, no one has even heard of the school. That goes with some of the word choices too, like "rigorous" or "quality", words that are point of view and are highly subjective. Unless they have a reliable and neutral source (i.e. not the school's own website), the words shouldn't be there. Most of the notable alumni were removed because, well, they aren't notable. Basically, if the person has a Wikipedia article, list them. If not, don't list them. There are rare exceptions to that policy, but the Notable alumni sections are to list notable people, not just successful people from the school. The notability has to be from Wikipedia's notability standard, not the school's. I removed the whole "clubs and activities" section because it was just about the Junior Classical League club. Those sections were mass added to numerous high school articles based on one website, regardless of whether the local OJCL chapter was even functioning or active. The article could use a referenced history section on the school itself and much more on academics (what kinds of classes are offered? Any that are unique or notable?). Remember when writing the article, it's not to promote the school; this is an encyclopedia article about the school. Be sure to read WP:BOOSTER too. --JonRidinger (talk) 04:45, 2 July 2011 (UTC)