Talk:St. Thomas Aquinas Preparatory Seminary

[Untitled]
Please, cite sources and use correct grammar! Dylanschrader (talk) 16:24, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

We shouldn't simply copy and paste news sources into this article. That's a violation of copyright as well as the Wikipedia guidelines. Dylanschrader (talk) 02:48, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

How about a separate section for the information about sexual abuse? Dylanschrader (talk) 02:48, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Also, we need to make sure that information about sexual abuse is really relevant to St Thomas rather than being merely tangential. Dylanschrader (talk) 16:24, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

I realize that there was a "dark hour" at STAS. However, one must not ignore the fact that much good came from the Hill, especially throughout my tenure (Class of 02'). I think some individuals' current mentality is similiar to "Throwing the baby out with the bath water." Further, I challenge this person(s) to have an open mind, and unbiased opinion towards St. Thomas Aquinas Seminary. It was not the seminary that failed, it was select individuals; who in turn have hurt countless persons.

Cbacker (talk) 17:53, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

While the abuses that occured are tragic, I believe the focus of the page should be put back into the spirit of wikipedia. This is an informational outlet, not a personal pulpit. The negativity and bias of one of the major authors does constitute a well written and informative article. Rabit 115 (talk) 21:37, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

A large portion of the material that has been added on sexual abuse is only tangentially related to St. Thomas. I plan to remove what does not actually relate to the school. Dylanschrader (talk) 21:37, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Most recent series of edits submitted by an anonymous user 168.166.80.132 and Mjwegs(talk) had caused the article to be reverted to a much older state and almost a years worth of editing was lost. I have reverted back to the last meaningful edit. Rabit 115 (talk) 13:01, 26 August 2009 (UTC)