Talk:St Benedict's School, Ealing

Call for Evidence
Further to Lord Carlile of Berriew QC commissioning, notices have been placed in local newspapers announcing a 'Call for Evidence'. How these notices will come to the attention of  people who may have moved away I don't know. There are no web citations (other than this at the end) to be found, so I am not going to add this info just yet, but if anybody elsr finds better citations they can then think about adding it to the article. --Aspro (talk) 17:07, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

sex abuse
Placed this in its own section--Mongreilf (talk) 17:38, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

As this was reverted I'll explain my reasons. If over a third of the history section is about sex abuse, it obviously dominates that section to such an extent that a new section maybe justified. This one topic out of 110 odd years taking up a third of the history seems to distort the section. The sex abuse is also notable in a way the rest of the history isn't. --Mongreilf (talk) 22:00, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Article neutrality
Much of the article reads like a school prospectus, especially the section on ethos that relies entirely on a single report from the Independent School's Inspectorate report of 2010. Either include and greater range of citations or remove unsubstantiated and / or biased content. 31.185.217.160 (talk) 14:07, 27 October 2013 (UTC)


 * I agree totally. I have previously removed this "marketing puff" from the article, but it keeps re-appearing. See my notes at User talk:Nhallisey. These are not objective facts, mere assertions. --The Sage of Stamford (talk) 21:13, 29 April 2014 (UTC)


 * I have now substantially edited to make the article more factual and to take away the promotional tone. I believe that it is now sufficiently neutral and have therefore removed the tag.--The Sage of Stamford (talk) 20:29, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on St Benedict's School, Ealing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091026051454/http://www.ealinggazette.co.uk:80/ealing-news/local-ealing-news/2009/10/09/jailed-child-pervert-priest-ruined-my-life-64767-24893070/ to http://www.ealinggazette.co.uk/ealing-news/local-ealing-news/2009/10/09/jailed-child-pervert-priest-ruined-my-life-64767-24893070/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 20:00, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

List of old boys
The list of old boys seems to not only have more members than the category, but also to contain far more detail for some of them than is necessary. I propose trimming it substantially, both by removing some of the less well-known old boys, and trimming the descriptions of those that remain. There should also be references for every member of the list. DuncanHill (talk) 22:34, 12 March 2018 (UTC)