Talk:St Cuthbert Without

CCHT external link
This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do). Laplacemat (talk) 10:11, 07 March 2022 (UTC)

Merger proposal
I am proposing to merge several articles into St Cuthbert Without. These are: Blackwell, Cumbria; Brisco, Cumbria; Carleton, Carlisle; and Durdar. These are all very brief and largely unreferenced stubs relating to villages / hamlets within the parish, and the information they contain can be easily contained in this article. I haven't included the other settlement in the parish, Wreay, for which a decent article already exists – more developed than the St Cuthbert one, actually. Jellyman (talk) 14:03, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I would point out that some appear to have been townships so there could be info to add regarding population and administration.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 20:01, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
 * For the 4 suggested, ✅ Klbrain (talk) 22:00, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Should Brisco and Carleton have been merged? In between tagging them in January 2017 and them being merged in July 2018 I added population data for Brisco and Carleton. A township with a stated population surely in some way constitutes a legally recognized place per WP:GEOLAND. While Klbrain is correct that there wasn't and express objection my comment above at least casts doubt. I however agree with keeping Blackwell and Durdar merged as indeed those don't contain any significant content.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 17:46, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Feel free to proposal a WP:SPLIT; I don't think that a merge reverse 3 years on is appropriate. Klbrain (talk) 11:10, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * OK, tagged split for the 2 suggested above.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 11:32, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I've restored the Brisco article given the above and the fact the proposer didn't object, I asked above since if the proposer had have agreed I could have done it straight away but otherwise a reverse proposal probably has to be made which I have now done.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 18:54, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Carleton now done, others left merged since the original concerns still remain.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 18:35, 27 December 2021 (UTC)