Talk:St Dona's Church, Llanddona/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: ♦ Dr. Blofeld  11:57, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

This is an exemplary GA quality article which meets all of the GA criteria, short, but very well focused and written, the way an encyclopedia article should be. I would, however, like to see an image of inside the church or churchyard when it becomes available. It's not ready for FA yet, and I doubt it ever could be unless far more detail was found on it local library archives which provide valuable information on its history in earlier times or coverage in more books but you've used some ideal books and sources to help you write this which is more than enough for GA. Good job, I'm promoting this.♦ Dr. Blofeld  18:04, 24 July 2011 (UTC)