Talk:St Eugrad's Church, Llaneugrad/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jimfbleak (talk · contribs) 14:48, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Just putting down a marker for now, review to follow soon  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  14:48, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

More tomorrow
 * Any chance of a stub for the saint?
 * I think it's good practice to link less common words like "nave" and "chancel" either at the first occurrence only, or once in the lead and once in the body.
 * link "vestry", "trefoil" "Art Nouveau" font (:


 * Thanks for stopping by (again) - one of these days I ought to read Blakeney in detail and comment more fully at FAC.
 * A stub-ette might have to wait for a few days, quite a hectic week or so at work (plus half-term with the kids)
 * I'll check, but that was my aim too - might have missed a first mention in the body, or relinked, through writing different sections at different stages and/or moving chunks around as the whim took me.
 * Will link those, particularly Font of course... early night tonight though so not now. BencherliteTalk 21:33, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Now added the links for your points 2 and 3. BencherliteTalk 14:46, 19 October 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: