Talk:St Mark's Anglican Community School

Untitled
It is an AWESOME School!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.59.104.2 (talk) 09:33, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 10:38, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Unverifiable edits,
Ludicrous, unverifiable statements in "St. Mark's Anglican Community School" article have not been corrected since mid-2014. If one were to take a moment to read either the article in question, or even it's revision history, it would readily become apparent that this article has been subject to vandalism.

Moderator "Padenton" has removed edits informing people of this situation.

Either inform readers that this article has been vandalised, or revert the article to a last known good state.


 * Please leave this uneditted until investigation complete.

Moderator "Padenton" has also appeared to have deleted a large amount of article history.........

Please note that this article is flagged as not citing any references or sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.59.64.105 (talk) 19:58, 20 March 2015 (UTC)


 * I am not a moderator, I undid your vandalism which was an improper edit to the article. I then removed what obvious vandalism I could and added a tag to the page to let readers know it was in dispute.  You then returned the obvious vandalism.  Make up your mind. &#8213;  Padenton  &#124;&#9742; 23:55, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Why was this reverted to a vandalized version? It is missing most of the previous information.

The last valid edit appears to be https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=St._Mark%27s_Anglican_Community_School&oldid=663048674 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.7.63.28 (talk) 09:06, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
 * See our policy on verifiability. —S MALL  JIM   09:36, 10 July 2015 (UTC)


 * I finally found the time and inclination to tidy up this article. It has been extensively vandalised for over a year and there's no reason to suppose those activities will cease, so I've semi-protected it for one year. —S MALL  JIM   10:10, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

S MALL, if you are going to remove the bulk of the content from an article, please provide verifiable *NON PRIMARY* sources. Please take the time, and carefully read the content of the link to Wikipedia's verifiability policy that you have quoted.

The mention of your "time and inclination" is of no relevance whatsoever. Furthermore, your behaviour in the destruction of this article appears to be nothing more than the ramblings of a disgruntled current, or former, student of this school.

If this article contains no *TRULY* verifiable facts, then it should be deleted, not redacted to the point of uselessness. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.166.40.244 (talk • contribs)


 * If you have any specific requests for changes that would improve the article, you may make them by submitting an edit request on this page. Another administrator (not me) will consider the request. —S MALL  JIM   21:26, 26 July 2015 (UTC)