Talk:St Peter ad Vincula, South Newington

Suggestions for article layout
References [1][2] and [5] - I suggest that these be changed from this form

to this form

and also that harv be added to the relevant. This will make the "Reference" link to the "Source".

Section "Bibliography" is a bit of a misnomer. See WP:FOOTERS, sub-heading "Works or Publications or Bibliography" - Bibliography is for lists of works by the article's subject. Lists of works used as reference should be headed "References"; and those not used as direct reference should be "Further reading". When I added Walker, I put it as "Further reading", because I did not draw any facts from it, so I followed the guide at WP:FURTHER. --Redrose64 (talk) 00:36, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

15 in England?
Are you sure? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Peter_ad_Vincula#England has 25, including one which is a Chapel and York Minster which is no longer called that.

I suggest making this 23. Or 25. Whichever makes sense. And linking to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Peter_ad_Vincula#England --Robert EA Harvey (talk) 17:24, 21 January 2018 (UTC)