Talk:Stable isotope standards and capture by anti-peptide antibodies

Neutrality question
I'd like to understand and address the neutrality dispute added to this page. What is the problem and how do we fix it? - Nleighanderson
 * Hi, Nleighanderson. First, please remember to sign your posts using four tildes. (Like this: ~ ) Second, the neutrality issue is because the article contains words I identified as puffery; it makes it seem a bit like promotion, but fixable enough not to warrant speedy deletion. Here's an example: "The SISCAPA workflow adds a unique enrichment step to the isotope dilution method" contains the word "unique," which, while it may be true, has a hint of puffery. However, the bigger problem is the article's use of overly technical terms which can confuse the average reader (including me!). Example: what does "patented immunoaffinity enrichment sample preparation workflow" mean? This article is fine to be on Wikipedia, but if you could assist me in cleaning up the problems as I listed above, that would be wonderful! Please refer to Make technical articles understandable for help with making it more understandable, and to Neutral point of view on how to present the article in a more neutral way. I hope this helped, and feel free to ask me any more questions you might have!  MereTechnicality   ⚙  13:03, 13 February 2017 (UTC)