Talk:Stafford Carson

Speedy deletion
I validly contested speedy deletion with an edit summary explaining why, but my edit was reverted without explanation. As I explained, the duplicate content appeared in our article before the other site, so any copyright violation is in the opposite direction. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 18:24, 13 May 2018 (UTC)


 * There are numerous examples of the copyvio, I have added another. red dogsix (talk) 19:00, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, the new link that you added does indicate that there is a copyight violation, because it pre-dates our article. The first link that you added does not. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 19:25, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... (the text had been refined and adapted in my own words) --Mogadorable (talk) 21:57, 13 May 2018 (UTC)