Talk:Stanford International Bank

offered Certificate of deposit (CDs) at rates consistently higher than those available from banks in the United States.
There is absolutely no proof nor references concerning ' significantly ' higher, therefore that is a blatant lie.

A certificate of deposit, as per their bank, is a deposit, bonded, where the individual fixes their money/capital for a determant time period, IE, a savings deposit, and not an investment. This coinage was in United States Dollars and not in U.K. pounds, which as usual in times of War, becomes the cause of a bicker about that same.

The really silly instance in all this, is that there is no reason at all to NOT provide support to the clients, 4 billion U.S.D being a drop in the ocean, especially in consideration of an average/median, of 40k per individual overal, all sections, expended for a War effort/afront.

4,000,000,000/40,000 100,000 individuals, in pure wages, not considering the equipment and overhead, which overal reach a factor of 3.

Merely, 33 thousand individuals.

Removed the statement considering ' significantly ' higher. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.88.245.101 (talk) 22:54, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Subsidiaries in Venezuela and Mexico
Banks in a nation, fall under the localized licensing procedures. That is, even though it has the name, 'abc' bank, it is the nation where it is placed from which they obtain a license to operate, and not anywhere else.

Added, in bolivares, for Venezuela, and in mexican coinage, for mexico. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.88.245.101 (talk) 22:59, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Changed headings, Venezuela and Mexico are two distinct affairs.
Seperated the Venezuelan and Mexico heading, the banks in question not having to do with other aspects of regulation, those for example in Aruba, or Peru, Chile and other nations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.88.245.101 (talk) 23:17, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Improbable
Changed the statement to, from between a 0.5 to 1.5% higher than a United States standard United States Government Bonded Certificat of Deposit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.88.245.101 (talk) 23:23, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Lacks, subsidiaries in other nations.
Added entry, subsidiaries in other nations: No known information (to be added). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.88.245.101 (talk) 23:35, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

References:
So, that's quite clean.

Missing references/sites.

Texas Court

&

Sec website

Needed, Bot.
Is there a bot that can go through dead link references, journalistic links (newspaper), to have these removed? Automated process.

Encyclopedic content is not journalistic content. For journalistic content you do a search at the News Paper in question, for encyclopedic content you reference the site/newspaper/library that would have the reference in question, and not the specific html page (which fades after days, weeks, months), or your references would be considered none verifyable.

Due the incessant use of newsprint for politics, war, creation and maintainance of underlying social unrest, most news print is not verifyable over time, and should not be included as a reference that would last.

That creates a need for seperation of references. Current, ephemeral, and longterm.

I sincerely doubt the entree on Stanford Bank would last the moment the bankruptcy itself is completely resolved, therefore the page itself is ephemeral and not a primary, but an entree onto an encyclopedic reference about bank runs, bank bankruptcies in times of War & Crisis. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.77.65.22 (talk) 11:39, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Finished.
Have a nice day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.77.65.22 (talk) 22:27, 22 April 2017 (UTC)