Talk:Star 69 / Weapon of Choice

Raccoons
Potential citations for "According to an interview, Walken got the inspiration for certain dance moves by observing raccoons.": http://www.rosenbaumcreative.com/walken/news/news.htm http://www.walkenworks.com/weapon.html (spelled as racoon on both pages). I don't know if those are authoritative or anything. --AshyRaccoon Talk 08:50, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Star69Weaponofchoice.jpg
Image:Star69Weaponofchoice.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 21:18, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

"low budget parody" link reverts
There have been a couple reverts over whether a link to this video should be included at the end of the article. I removed the link because it didn't seem noteworthy. It's not that the video is bad or whatever (it's pretty cool), but as far as I know inclusion of the link is not justified according to Wpedia policy. The link was removed once before and the IP that put it back in recently has never made any edits except the insertion of this link in this article. As such my establishing this discussion entry to determine the fate of the link without ending up in a revert war is probably vain, since the editor doesn't seem to be very active. Well. Yothgoboufnir (talk) 02:44, 5 May 2010 (UTC)