Talk:Star Trek: Away Team

"Even though the game franchise was on a deline, Away Team did do good in sales and got good reviews."

Untitled
Ignoring the spelling/grammar for the moment: http://www.gamerankings.com/htmlpages2/913866.asp

--86.137.130.143 13:05, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

"I changed the format layout of this page to match it to all the other pages on the Wikipedia. I also uploaded and added the front box picture for the game." - Lucky Foot

——

--KILNA 08:37, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

This is not a real-time strategy game, it's turn-based tactics game as described by other wikipedia articles... I've changed the categorization, etc. to match.

Relation to Fallout
I've heard that the codebases for Away Team and Fallout have a substantial amount in common, and may even use the same "engine". How much truth is there to this? 216.228.20.138 07:48, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Redirect from Away team
I can not understand why, when I clicked a "away team" wikilink in Communicator (Star Trek), I've been brought here by a redirect, to an article about a not so much known video game, instead of one which deals with "away team" meaning in Star Trek series (that is: the landing party), which is by far more known (even to not-Star Trek fan) and more notable. So, I can not understand this redirect. --79.21.150.43 (talk) 20:34, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Agreed. This is one of the worst redirects I've ever seen.  I'm trying to rectify this problem. Viriditas (talk) 01:59, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Much better with "away team" now going to the disambig page. Miyagawa (talk) 12:49, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
 * As was pointed out in the earlier reversions, that is not "much better", but worse as WP:MALPLACED. The WP:RM that has finally been opened is much better, and (assuming it results in the move) then the dab can be rearranged. -- JHunterJ (talk) 14:11, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
 * You're confusing proper redirects and dabs with a now deleted deletion discussion. The video game has never been the primary topic.  Viriditas (talk) 18:07, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
 * You're confusing English words with whatever gave you that impression. I responded to "away team now going to the disambig page", a description of the WP:MALPLACED arrangement. -- JHunterJ (talk) 03:15, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Nonsense! Why does "away team" still redirect here, a week after the problem was identified and a fix was attempted?  You have used the bureaucracy of Wikipedia to prevent editors from fixing the problem. This is unacceptable. Is it more important to follow procedure or to fix a glaring error?  The policies are clear on this. Viriditas (talk) 05:18, 2 February 2015 (UTC)