Talk:Star Trek: The Next Generation season 1/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:30, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

I will take a look. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:30, 10 June 2016 (UTC)


 * I t was the first live-action television series in the franchise to be broadcast since Star Trek: The Original Series - I'd add something about the year the first series concluded its last season.


 *  The characters in the series gradually changed during preproduction, with adjustments made to the names of some characters. remove one "character" from the sentence


 *  Such were the troubles that the series had trouble recruiting potential writers halfway through the season - ditto "trouble"


 *  Paramount executives began to work on ideas to bring Star Trek back to television,[1] hiring writer/producer Greg Strangis to develop some ideas - ditto "ideas"


 *  Although they hadn't planned on it originally,  - unabbreviate


 *  After Fontana continued to opposed lower than the rates dictated by WGA rates, Roddenberry brought his personal lawyer, Leonard Maizlish to argue his case - the grammar is awry methinks...


 *  These featured several minor differences in the names - from the eventual names? or somesuch?


 * Earwig's copyvio clear


 * Thanks, I've edited out those issues having made the changes as suggested. Miyagawa (talk) 16:49, 10 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Couple of queries - any cast quit after season 1, and were there any proposed episodes that didn't make it to air? Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:33, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh my god. I missed out Denise Crosby leaving didn't I? I'll get that added - I wrote so much about it elsewhere that I forgot to add it here! The Gates McFadden departure I've already included on the season 2 article, as with "Blood and Fire" which was the famous episode which didn't get included in the first two seasons. I'll post another note here when I've added the Crosby paragraph. Miyagawa (talk) 08:50, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I've fixed that utter blunder. I honestly cannot believe I left that out. I also decided while editing that it was worthwhile mentioning that McFadden was fired at the end of the first season, but unlike the second season article I didn't go into her replacement etc. Miyagawa (talk) 09:07, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

1. Well written?:
 * Prose quality:
 * Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
 * References to sources:
 * Citations to reliable sources, where required:
 * No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:
 * Major aspects:
 * Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
 * Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?
 * No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
 * Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: - great, well done. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:03, 12 June 2016 (UTC)