Talk:Star Wars: Dark Forces/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:08, 23 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I've taken care of those. --Bill (talk 12:38, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you to Bill for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:17, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks ThinkBlue. --Bill (talk 16:55, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem. :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:35, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
 * "do the enemies attack the jedis with axes? If so, that's a stupid question from me, also because I needed to be sure. If not, you might want to explain that." - ...what? I'm having trouble understanding that. There are no "jedis" in Dark Forces. And it seems to me that "Everyday life" is the wrong category for a video game... Some guy (talk) 08:01, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm sure ThinkBlue was referring to Kyle. Everyday life is the standard GA category for video games. --Bill (talk 11:42, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Regardless of that, it seems to me that a "good article" assessment isn't worth very much if it is assessed by someone who can barely form coherent sentences. I think it's a good article but I'd almost want it reassessed just for the principle of it. Some guy (talk)
 * I think that's unnecessarily harsh. I have WP:GAN watchlisted because I've done a couple of reviews myself, ThinkBlue has done over 200 and I've never seen any question over the quality of her reviews. In my opinion this one is no different. If this is over the "Jedis" → "Kyle" thing then I think you're overreacting. --Bill (talk 03:16, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, that was harsh. Some of her language was just awkward for me to read but now I realize it's just because she's not familiar with a lot of the subject matter and I'm so used to it I didn't think about it. I apologize. Some guy (talk) 07:09, 26 January 2009 (UTC)