Talk:Star Wars Technical Commentaries

Addressed lack of NPOV and tightened up the language. Last paragraph and ICS aside were unnecessary for an article dealing with SWTC. Please correct any errors. --Rev Prez 06:07, 29 May 2005 (UTC)


 * I'd have to admit you fused the first two paragraphs pretty well. However, I think the third paragraph is also important and its contents may be condensed, but not deleted. Because I don't have time to fix it all just yet, I'd just pull the old paragraph out. Maybe you can try to fuse it. Later, I hope to dramatically expand the page. As it is, the thing is at stub length. If we are going to have an article at all, let's have one that's full-sized.


 * If we can substantiate the third paragraph and cite, then I'm all for keeping it. Also, should we consider collapsing SWTC into a larger Star Wars "fanon" article (or something else that exists)?  I'm going to propose doing the same for SD.net.  --Rev Prez 06:31, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * I'd find more specific examples later, but I just linked a thread that shows some of Saxton's enemies at TFN, and a second showing some of Paul Hidalgo's antics. When I expand the third paragraph into another "Criticisms" section in the AOTC vein, I'd try and find specific TFN threads involving each point. --Kazuaki Shimazaki 15:46, 1 June 2005 (UTC)