Talk:Star of the North (film)

Requested move 5 October 2022

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Moved to Star of the North (film). Per consensus, moving to (film) while putting hatnote on Airhawk. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 14:49, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

– a cursory Google search shows only 2 returns in the first 500 ressults that are for this film, the Wikipedia article and IMDB. This does not appear to be a primary topic. (note: there is a 1981 film with this name as well, it is located at its alternate name Airhawk) -- 65.92.247.226 (talk) 07:08, 5 October 2022 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Star of the North → Star of the North (1914 film)
 * Star of the North (disambiguation) → Star of the North
 * support per nom—blindlynx 15:19, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Move to Star of the North (film), and add a hatnote to Airhawk. See WP:NCFILM. 162 etc. (talk) 16:36, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Support per nomination. When it was created nearly eight years ago (in January 2015), the two-sentence stub delineating the 1914 film was the sole Wikipedia entry bearing the exact main title header "Star of the North". However, the newly created (earlier today) Star of the North (disambiguation) page lists 18 entries and, although the stub for the 1914 film still remains the sole exact title, that header should have initially redirected to Polaris. As for Star of the North (1914 film) versus Star of the North (film), if there was an indication that Star of the North (1981 film) had a wide release in the UK under that title, then perhaps there would be an argument for using the form Star of the North (1914 film) as the stub's header. Otherwise, the shorter form — Star of the North (film), per 162 etc. — would likely suffice. However, if consensus prefers retaining the definitive clarity of the form Star of the North (1914 film), I would likewise support that. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 19:33, 5 October 2022 (UTC)