Talk:Stargate/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.'' As part of WikiProject Good articles' Project quality task force, all old good articles are being re-reviewed to ensure that they meet current good article criteria (as detailed at WP:WIAFA. In reviewing this article, I have found that it doesn't meet criteria for the following reasons:

Given the number of issues and concerns above, I am boldly delisting this article. Remember that you can renominate an article at WP:GAN at any time. Direct any comments or queries to my talk page (I don't watchlist these old reviews and won't see any changes.) Thanks, Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk  ) 20:35, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The lead does not adequately summarize the entire article (WP:LEAD).
 * There are many sections that are inadequately referenced, or unreferenced entirely. Examples:
 * The entire "Premise" section (which also seems to have some original research issues as well);
 * Most of "Game Releases" subsection;
 * Lines here and there throughout the description of the television releases (and there's a cn tag in there too.)
 * Excessive use of non-free content (WP:NFCC). File:SGUcast.jpg, File:Sga poster 1.JPG, File:StargateInfinity 2008-DVD-cover.jpg, and File:Sg1-poster.jpg, besides generally being too high a resolution anyhow, do not add significantly to the article (especially as there are subpages for all these items.)
 * There are lots of one-to-two-line paragraphs that aren't real paragraphs. These either need to be deleted, merged (or judging by content) should be expanded.
 * The "Reception" section touches on very little about the cultural impact and critical reception of the series, instead giving out a lot of numbers without much context. I would strongly recommend some of the subarticles be folded into the main article to bolster it.
 * There's next to no info about development; it needs to be boosted a bit for each of the shows. In general, there's just a lack of information. I suggest you look at FA-class articles on similar subjects (ex. House (TV series) to see what's expected structurally.