Talk:State-of-the-Art Car/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: ArnabSaha (talk · contribs) 12:40, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it well written?
 * A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
 * B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * 1) Is it verifiable with no original research?
 * A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
 * B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons&mdash;science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
 * C. It contains no original research:
 * D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
 * B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Comment

 * The article mainly talks about the history. Maybe add another section "Today" and describe the current situation.
 * I've added a few words to indicate that it's been at the same location since 1989.
 * Or make a separate section for specifications.
 * I've separated design/development and testing into two top=level sections, and added a bit more about the specifications. How does that look?
 * Also move the citation from lead WP:CITELEAD.
 * CITELEAD allows citations in the lede if needed. In this case, it was added because an editor was arguing about the correct capitalization of the name.
 * If not arguing anymore (I don't find any), I will prefer removing that. Maybe add it here "1971 to manage the State-of-the-Art Car (SOAC) project."  Saha ❯❯❯  Stay safe    08:06, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Boston, Chicago, Cleveland, New York City, and Philadelphia - wikilink them.
 * Maybe add a note for Lo- and Hi-density, why they are Lo and Hi instead of Low and High. Its something new for first time readers like me.
 * I don't have an explanation for that, other than "the 70s were a weird time"...
 * "(The other two operating..." the bracket starts but doesnt end.
 * "1676mm broad gauge" use  template for things like this.
 * "small loading gauge" also add the dimensions.
 * "1676mm broad gauge" use  template for things like this.
 * "small loading gauge" also add the dimensions.
 * "small loading gauge" also add the dimensions.
 * "small loading gauge" also add the dimensions.

 Saha ❯❯❯  Stay safe    19:57, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the comments! I believe I've addressed all so far. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:09, 14 October 2020 (UTC)


 * One more thing. Describe the mixed reactions of operating agencies, like how they were opposite to people's reactions as they dropped the project.
 * I've added what I can; the source doesn't say much.
 * Also add the scrapping year in infobox. Other than these, I dont find any other issues.  Saha ❯❯❯  Stay safe  </b> </b> 08:06, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * None were scrapped. I've added the number preserved.
 * Yeah, preserved...

Congrats, passed. <b style="border:1px solid black"> <b style="color:#FF0000">Saha</b> ❯❯❯ <b style="color:#0043AF"> Stay safe  </b> </b> 18:44, 14 October 2020 (UTC)