Talk:State Arsenal (Providence, Rhode Island)

RfC: Gallery contents and formatting
Which of these two contents and formats for this article's gallery is preferred?

Gallery #1 (in situ)

Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:07, 21 June 2021 (UTC)


 *  A neutral pointer to this discussion has been placed on the talk pages of the WikiProjects listed above. WP:CANVASSING of individual editors should be avoided. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:12, 21 June 2021 (UTC) 

Survey

 * #1 - The version of the middle of the three images in Gallery #1 is easier for the reader to see, and all three images are better at the slightly larger size they are presented at in that gallery. Centering the gallery looks neater and more professional. The smaller postage-stamp size of Gallery #2 does the reader a disservice by being so small and cramped.  Gallery #2 is at the default size, but, as per WP:Gallery:
 * The default size of a gallery should be understood as simply the size that images are presented at if nothing else is specified, not as the preferred size of the images.
 * We are given the capability of adjusting the size of images in the gallery for a reason, to better present them to the reader in a form that is easy to see and understand. Gallery #1 performs that task better than Gallery #2. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:07, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I usually don't care for packed galleries, but I am fine with the alternate offered by MB, Gallery #3. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:35, 21 June 2021 (UTC)


 * #3 - looks best to me. MB 02:52, 21 June 2021 (UTC)


 * #1 - I prefer No. 1 with a specified fix width. But the specified fixed height should be omitted per WP:IMGSIZE, imo. -Fnlayson (talk) 02:56, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * The height is not fixed (note that the middle image is not as tall as the other two), the height parameter sets the maximum height with the width that's specified and the aspect ratio unchanged. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:41, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Understood, thanks. That was not clear to me from the image & gallery help type pages before, but that does make sense. -Fnlayson (talk) 04:11, 21 June 2021 (UTC)


 * #2 I do not really care about the alignment or using mode=packed so long as it looks good in the article. What I do care about is image size. #2 is slightly too small, but #2 is noticeably improperly large on my browser. ɱ  (talk) 14:31, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * #1 Yes, I agree with -Fnlayson Deathlibrarian (talk) 23:57, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * #2 Filetime (talk) 18:33, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
 * #3 Looks better. BristolTreeHouse (talk) 10:42, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
 * #1 Preference on the first one. Sea Ane (talk) 21:16, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
 * #1 The nature of the drawings/photograph in this case make the images hard to distinguish when they are made very small. The first options looks better and is more useful, the 2nd option might as well be linked text since you need to click on them to actually see anything. Also, it's not like this is some big, cluttered article. Option 1 looks good at the end of the article. PraiseVivec (talk) 11:29, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
 * #3/3A The borders are unnecessary imo. Some1 (talk) 14:19, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
 * #3 I generally prefer a packed gallery, especially if there are only a few photos. Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 22:23, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Discussion
Gallery #3 (an alternate offered by MB)


 * Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:22, 21 June 2021 (UTC)