Talk:State Board of Administration of Florida

Information from the St. Petersburg Times is not credible. Deleted information is no longer relevant, timely or correct. People who are interested in the SBA know the language, and will understand what is out there... those that do not, should not be relying on Wiki for their information, and utilize the website and official publications from the SBA, which is where most of the new language came from... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.160.242.13 (talk) 17:44, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Deleting referenced material without replacement material
An IP claiming to be an employee of this institution had some suggestions regarding the page but was unaware of how to use the talkpage. The IP editor said "its not too hard to see that by my IP address, I work at the very institution the page is dedicated to and there are probably good reasons for the deleted text. A simple read of the language shows that it is out of date"  someone should follow up on this. Hobartimus (talk) 12:30, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Not familiar with what the "talkpage" was - I am guessing the tab named "Discussion" is one in the same...

That being said, yes, the information is out of date. Preliminary data has been reported, however, formal data will be available in the very near future. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.160.242.13 (talk) 12:44, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Please feel free to update the article as the new data becomes available. Hobartimus (talk) 15:28, 29 July 2011 (UTC)


 * We don't generally delete referenced material without a replacement. Census data stays there for ten years even when the bureau provides annual "guesses." This report was "in the ballpark" of what the fund is. Not $10,000, not $1 million, not $1 billion, not $10 billion, but "around" $100 billion. There is no other material in the article that objectively indicates the impact of this organization. Erasing it is really not an option.
 * No reason it can't go into "History" until it has a replacement. It would be better to have a graph or table that shows information over the years, ultimately. Student7 (talk) 14:31, 31 July 2011 (UTC)


 * I got this information originally out of a newspaper. I haven't seen any new article. We don't update "to the minute" when changes are made. Editors may change something with a new and equally good reference. But remember to include it as history. No editor is permanently responsible to update every fact s/he entered in Wikipedia forever! It's supposed to be a collaboration. Student7 (talk) 14:34, 31 July 2011 (UTC)


 * I started talking to this guy on 27 July. He is not responsive. Student7 (talk) 14:42, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Actually, there is quite a bit of information deleted from other pages. But if you want to keep stale information, so be it. Newspapers don't always report the truth, I can point to hundreds of cases where that is the fact. But if you want to rely on your sources, I will come back and edit appropriately. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.160.242.13 (talk) 12:26, 16 August 2011 (UTC)


 * "Stale" information is better than no information. We keep "stale" census data for ten years. It seems to work okay.
 * What is "untruthful" about the information as reported as of that date? Student7 (talk) 16:13, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Boby building
Shashi Kumar First Indian Bodybuilder to get Pro Card holder from both the countries by winning Bronze Medal from America and Silver Medal from Europe. Shashikumar90 (talk) 10:54, 15 August 2022 (UTC)