Talk:State law (United States)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on State law (United States). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20101228000641/http://www.la-legal.com/modules/smartsection/item.php?itemid=7 to http://www.la-legal.com/modules/smartsection/item.php?itemid=7

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 09:42, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

The Connecticut material is a non sequitur
It doesn't flow at all. It comes out of nowhere, a sudden digression to Connecticut statutes, then a sudden switch back to a completely different topic, codification. Or as we say in the legal profession, objection, relevance. Okay, it's not a word salad, but it's close. --Coolcaesar (talk) 05:25, 19 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Hey, on my talk page you asked What relevance does the printing of the statutes of Connecticut possibly have in the middle of a discussion of interstate (not intrastate) diversity of state law? - but the discussion of Connecticut statutes comes after the section on State_law_(United_States) right? It's in the next section. Prior to my restoration of the Connecticut section, it started with The first reaction, codification, was an attempt - there was no sense of what had been reacted to, whereas the Connecticut thing at least set the stage of unwritten law (albeit in that state). After reading it more carefully, I see what you mean and I replaced the Connecticut section with a citation which starts to discuss the early movement. II  | (t - c) 15:20, 9 April 2018 (UTC)