Talk:Statement veracity analysis

As interesting as this is, this article is terrible. Moon.

19:41, 8 January 2008 (UTC)19:41, 8 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Concur. Grammatical errors, too wordy, and lacks any criticism....There was in fact an earlier Wiki article on this topic, titled simply "Statement Analysis". It was marginally better written than this one, but smacked of advertising (and mentioned a Mark McLish who maintains a website which among other things offers the analysis as a service). It had three references: one was McLish's website, another was the South African one, and one that is/was no longer functioning. Wonder why that article is gone??


 * Theres a lot to correct here. Engr105th (talk) 00:46, 28 July 2008 (UTC)


 * This article feels like it has been copy and pasted from somewhere else, with absolutely minimum attempt at wikification. I will make a small attempt to begin wikification and start adding relevant improvement labels. Petemyers (talk) 00:45, 23 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Ok, forget it, this article is exactly the same as another with a similar name. Adding a merge tag. Petemyers (talk) 00:48, 23 September 2008 (UTC)