Talk:Station Group Banak/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 21:53, 17 December 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Some things that are italicized don't need to be ("Luftwaffe", "Wehrmacht" are both common enough in English), but others aren't and need to be (Operation Nordlicht).
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * "to deploy two battalions consisting of 10,000 men" - this may be different in Norway, but battalions are fairly small units (around a thousand or fewer men). Should this be two brigades?
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Just a few small nitpicks, otherwise this article looks ready to go. Good job. Parsecboy (talk) 21:53, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I have tended to your comments, and done some other minor copyedits as well. You were right about the battalion/brigade issue, luckily the source was found online. Geschichte (talk) 14:23, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Passed per above. Wizardman  00:51, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking care of it, Wizardman. Parsecboy (talk) 12:52, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you all three for looking after the article. I am sorry I have not had the health to stop by Wikipedia at late. I will remember the italicization rules to next time :) Arsenikk (talk)  21:42, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I have tended to your comments, and done some other minor copyedits as well. You were right about the battalion/brigade issue, luckily the source was found online. Geschichte (talk) 14:23, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Passed per above. Wizardman  00:51, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking care of it, Wizardman. Parsecboy (talk) 12:52, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you all three for looking after the article. I am sorry I have not had the health to stop by Wikipedia at late. I will remember the italicization rules to next time :) Arsenikk (talk)  21:42, 23 January 2013 (UTC)