Talk:Stay Puft Marshmallow Man/Archive 1

Own Article

 * Not really worthy of its own article. --Cheese Sandwich 16:10, 20 August 2005 (UTC)


 * I disagree. Unlike a paper encyclopedia, there's no fundamental limit on the number of articles that it can contain.


 * Atlant 00:01, 22 August 2005 (UTC)


 * I think it should be merged with the Ghost Busters page because the Stay-Puff Marshmallow Man was a fictional advertisement character created for the movie. Captainhero


 * Okay, my two cents' worth : feeling intrigued to see Stay Puft Marshmallow Man here and there in various vids, I couldn't definitely place where it came from. Googled it, Wiki ranks second, and there it is : this is Ghostbusters' popular culture icon. Today Wikipedia thaugt me something again. 83.206.96.73 (talk) 19:37, 26 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Notability seems marginal at best. It's true that WP is not paper, but it's also not a collection of random trivia. The subject is only notable if it has some relevance independent of the Ghostbusters franchise. Is there evidence of this?--RDBury (talk) 11:44, 19 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I like the article. Well written. Keep it.--Jojhutton (talk) 22:32, 25 May 2009 (UTC)


 * That doesn't make any sense. Every other character in the movie has their own page.  Does Ray Stanz have any relevance outside of the Gostbusters franchise?  And yet he has his own page.  In fact, just about every fictional character on every TV show has their own page. I don't see any reason why this page should be considered any less relevant than those pages. Tgpaul58 (talk) 01:18, 22 June 2009 (UTC)


 * No, "just about every fictional character on every TV show" does not have its own article. Wikipedia has notability guidelines. Characters must show notability through significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources. This character has no demonstrable real-world significance and nothing of relevance can be said purely about the character beyond its ties to the film. And just because WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not an excuse to allow inappropriate articles or content. -- AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs) 01:22, 22 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep separate, the Marshmallow Man is a popular culture symbol. "The subject is only notable if it has some relevance independent of the Ghostbusters franchise." Is a bit ridiculous, how notable are most characters outside their respective franchises. How notable is Fido Dido, the Pillsbury Doughboy or Chester Cheetah outside their respective companies? Dr. Stantz (talk) 15:58, 25 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep Separate, he is one of the main characters that reappears within the Ghostbusters franchise and is one of its main villains/heroes such as Unicron, Destro, or Bizarro, the character also made it's way into stores as a product, and other then some mentions of the movie, the references tell more about the character and its product, then they do about the Ghostbusters franchise. As I recall he was also part of the Universal Studios Tour and in that way is also a mascot/icon next to slimer and the "No Ghosts" symbol.(Floppydog66 (talk) 04:02, 29 June 2009 (UTC))


 * Merge with Ghostbusters. A minor monster from the series does not deserve his own articleGeorge Pelltier (talk) 23:50, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Keep separate, a LexisNexis academic news search brings back 173 returns found in articles from large newspapers in various parts of the world since 1986, which should at least demonstrate some form of minimum "notability" according to policy. In addition to the movie, the character's name appears to have also found its way into common usage as a synonym for "puffiness" and "excess", and is applied to everything from overweight athletes to over engineered software. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 19:17, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose merger. There is more than enough material to substantiate a separate article.  bd2412  T 19:24, 26 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Agreed with the above, keep a seperate article. It is definately notable enough because it is a recurring character in various media in the Ghostbusters series. --99.157.108.248 (talk) 01:23, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

How tall?
The article used to say the marshmallow man was 200 feet tall; an anonymous editor just changed it to 112 feet, 6 inches.

Does anyone know for sure, or better yet, have a citation?

Atlant 14:08, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

The 15th Anniversary Edition Ghostbusters DVD has interviews with the production crew. During this interview, Mark Stetson (the model shop supervisor for the film) categorically states that the Stay Puft Marshmallow Man is exactly one hundered and Twelve and a half feet tall.

-Edward (Just a random contributor) 3 July 2006 172.214.161.98 19:20, 3 July 2006‎ (UTC)

HERE IS THE DEFINITIVE ANSWER (definitive cos it cannot be denied)

ALL one has to do is know that at some point, Mr. Stay Puft is stand's right next to 2 Columbus Circle which stands at 158 feet.

200ft IS WRONG because he doesn't tower above the building. 112ft IS WRONG because he doesn't reach just two thirds up the building, he's much taller but not as tall as the building itself.

He therefore stands at around 132ft, give or take 1-2ft or so. This IS NOT speculation, it's definitive because you 'do not' go by what anyone involved in the movie says or even by the Ghostbusters II quote ("We conjured up a 100ft Marshmallow man ...."). Instead you go by what you see in the movie, common sense then the mathematics. Simples ! !

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.31.79.152 (talk) 10:37, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Stay Puft vs. Stay-Puft
I know it's a small detail, but as far as I can tell, the name should not contain a hyphen. Look at the hat: STAY PUFT. I've edited the content but am not intuitively able to edit the title (am too lazy to try to figure out how to do it).


 * Someone may also want to check the closed-captioning or subtitles on the movie. In any case, if it turns out that it should be just "Stay Puft...", use the "move" feature to move the ARTICLE page (and not just this 'talk' page) to its new title. A REDIRECT page will automagically be created at the old title, but you should also look to see what links to the (now) REDIRECT page as you'll want to catch and fix the dreaded "double redirects".


 * Atlant 14:57, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Real Stay Puft
I know SP was used as a marketing gimmick for real marshmallows at some point. It would be neat if someone could find a photo and some info about this. --68.41.122.213 14:17, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Kingpin1055 That might just be confusion being drawn from the Pillsbury Dough Boy... I've never come across any mention of Stay Puft being used by a company to market their own marshmallows... although I think a brand of RGB sweets (Maybe even marshmallows) featured him

yes, he was used in the 50's and 60's for the stay puft marshmallow company( I dont think they're in buisness now)

Clio's birthday
I've recreated this article over the redirect. There's already quite a lot of referenced material and besides, as a birthday gift (see User talk:Clio the Muse) I'm going to try to push it to GA, which means it should get bigger... and better. --Dweller 08:43, 17 August 2007 (UTC)


 * At the moment too much of the text assumes familiarity with the Ghostbusters film for it to be satisfactory as a good article. When was Ghostbusters released, who is Ray Stanz, what is a Proton Pack, or a Containment Grid? The section on The Real Ghostbusters mentions a character called Peter, but who is Peter? The article says that "his image has been found in a microscopic etching on a 1988 Mac computer chip", but what does this mean? Was the image the result of a natural process, or was it drawn? "A moderate amount of merchandise has focused around the character and has become an icon for the Ghostbusters film" is a very poor sentence. The article states that each suit cost $50,000, whereas the IMDB lists the cost as $20,000. And so forth. -Ashley Pomeroy 15:57, 20 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks - useful. At the moment, this is still a chunk of text hacked out of a main article, so it's kack. Feel free to improve it! Your comments are useful, thanks. --Dweller 16:11, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

wrong picture
the action figure in the "Kenner's Marshmallow Man action figure" picture isnt the action figure made by kenner its the one made by Columbia Pictures and its obvious because that one is made out of plastic. the one made by kenner is made out of polyester. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pauldonald86 (talk • contribs) 14:09, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Stay Puft = Gozer
I know there is talk of moving/eliminating this article, so here's my suggestion. If the Stay Puft Marshmallow Man is just a form that Gozer took, maybe the Stay Puft Marshmallow Man info should just be a subsection of a Gozer the Gozerian article. Evan1975 (talk) 19:03, 10 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Except that Stay Puft was treated as a completely seperate character in the cartoon series, and apparently in the upcoming video game as well. User:Zigra

In the videogame its treated as an avatar of Gozer (so it is Gozer, albeit in puffy white form), and is even said to be the form Gozer has to take for this dimension because it was the one that was picked (one form/avatar per dimension). And Dan Akroyd has said the video game is in the canon as far as I know.--66.66.212.182 (talk) 09:14, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Ghostbusters episode?
This article says that there was a Real Ghostbusters episode that showed or talked about Egon positively charging the ecto-plasmic/marshmallow remains of the original Stay Puft to create a good Stay Puft. Which episode was this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.230.81.136 (talk) 07:56, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Goldberg
Is the Jonah Goldberg thing at the beginning necessary or relevant? It doesn't really add much.--66.66.212.182 (talk) 09:14, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

His Name
His name is NOT "Stay Puft Marshmallow Man". If you listen to Ray's dialogue, he clearly calls him "Mr. Stay Puft", which is his actual name. MontyPrime (talk) 04:24, 23 August 2009 (UTC)


 * He is referred to as the "Stay Puft Marshmallow Man" throughout the films and the series and in official works. -- AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs) 04:41, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * He's called each name once in the first movie. Mr. Stay Puft is his proper name. He never showed up and was never mentioned in the second movie.MontyPrime (talk) 04:48, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Provide a reliable source saying so, otherwise it is purely your opinion and not consistent with the actual official materials. -- AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs) 05:16, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Stay Puft Marshmallow Man. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for //www.kennertoys.com/history/history3.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 07:59, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:39, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
 * The Stay Puft Marshmallow Man in Newburyport Massachusetts 2017.png