Talk:Steady-state evoked potential

Regan work
Interesting new material. I believe it adds substantially to the value of the article, but could use work in a couple of respects. Most importantly, the article as now written is only understandable by people with a very high level of technical sophistication (such as me, but I'm not the target audience of Wikipedia). It would be much better for a brief introduction that lays out the concepts at a level appropriate for a reader with a modest understanding of brain electrical activity. Second, there are too many references. Unlike a scientific journal, Wikipedia prefers a few "secondary" references (i.e., review papers, textbooks, etc) to a large mass of primary references. So, it would be nice to pare this down to the essentials. If you can do that, I'll help with the formatting of the references. Looie496 (talk) 02:42, 17 September 2008 (UTC)