Talk:Steam-Heart's/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: DasallmächtigeJ (talk · contribs) 11:59, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

1. Is it well-written?
In short, yes. The layout seems perfectly fine, so does grammar/spelling.

2. Is it verifiable with no original research?
Yes, the article is meticulously sourced. All sources are reliable.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?
'Yes.. It covers everything from development, gameplay, to reception.

However, I would encourage User:TarkusAB to include a plot summary, giving a brief overview of plot and setting. I would do it myself, but the only English source here does not provide a useful plot summary, and all Youtube playthroughs of the game I could find used Japanese audio (I take it it never was released outside of Japan). I do not know how intricate the plot is, but I always consider it a must to include a plot summary if a game has one. As Tarkus seems to speak Japanese, maybe he/she can check back with me on this point.

4. Is it neutral?
Yes.

5. Is it stable?
Yes. Absolutely nothing is going to change here.

6. Is it illustrated?
Yes, sufficiently.

Conclusion
After examining the article, I conclude that it qualifies for an immediate pass. However, I would like to hear back from Tarkus whether a plot summary is doable/makes sense, until which I will delay finishing the review.--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 11:59, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I split out the plot into its own section and added some details. I don't want to push too much undue weight on the plot per WP:VG/PLOT, and the details are not commented on by any sources. TarkusAB talk 14:44, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Alright, perfect! I'll update the status of the article right now.--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 15:42, 9 February 2019 (UTC)