Talk:Steep Holm/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Onel5969 (talk · contribs) 15:18, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria Will take a day or two to finish. Please be patient.
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * No copyvio issue. There are some grammar issues throughout the article, particularly in the history section, especially with run-on and awkward sentences. I'll point out some - Prehistoric: the 4th and 5th sentences in the 2nd paragraph; Religious foundations: 1st, 8th, 9th sentences; Manorial, sentences 2, 4, 7, 2nd paragraph, sentences 1, 3,
 * I have attempted to improve these.&mdash; Rod talk 15:49, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi - there are still quite a few throughout the article. I went in to the sections I mentioned and made some corrections. This is really the only issue I still see. Very nice job so far.  Onel 5969  TT me 01:01, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I have been through and made a few more grammar changes. Are there other "run-on and awkward sentences" that I'm not spotting?&mdash; Rod talk 08:49, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi - There are a couple throughout (the World wars section) comes to mind. But I don't think enough to keep this from GA. You might want to take one more look.  Onel 5969  TT me 16:57, 3 September 2015 (UTC)


 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * Lead is a good summary of the article, good layout.
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * Well referenced. Couple of places that might be cases of WP:CITEKILL (e.g. 2nd paragraph in Palmerston Fort - consider of moving some to an "External links" section)
 * B. Cites reliable sources, where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * Everything is well sourced.
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * Covers the island and all its aspects.
 * B. Focused (see summary style):
 * No section goes into too much depth, yet each section adequately covers its subject.
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * All images are public domain or have the appropriate CC license
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall: pass
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall: pass
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail: