Talk:Stefan Molyneux

Why does "Dispute Resolution Organization" redirect here?
"Dispute Resolution Organization" redirects here despite this article not mentioning them once. Nuclearnerd321 (talk) 06:23, 21 February 2024 (UTC)


 * @Nuclearnerd321: Good catch! I noticed that that page used to redirect to Dispute resolution organization, which used to be an article itself before it was also redirected here (and then deleted). I've enquired with the administrator who deleted that page to see if it can be undeleted - that page's history might shed more light on why it was redirected here in the first place, and the article that was there prior to the deletion may potentially be a better target for the redirects than here :)
 * Thanks for bringing this up! All the best, &zwj;—&zwj;a smart kitten[ meow] 07:22, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Banned from platforms; software career in lede
I don’t see why these points belong in the lede for this guy. He’s not famous for his career in software. That he’s banned from platforms is not remotely what he’s notable for, and is also subject to change that may not be tracked in reliable sources. Why is it lede-worthy? Zanahary (talk) 16:23, 28 April 2024 (UTC)


 * It is not what he is notable for, but it is notable about him, if that makes some sense. Being banned, at least at one point in his career, from four major online platforms, all for violating hate speech policies, is extraordinary and illustrates just how extreme Molyneux is. However, given that a lead is supposed to summarize the article, I think this should be broadened to include the travel ban and visa entry episodes.
 * Basically, the lead should get across that he is, in essence, a persona non grata in multiple jurisdictions/spaces, both on- and offline. TucanHolmes  (talk) 18:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Surely that can be expressed without just listing a bunch of platforms. It is not that important. Zanahary (talk) 17:40, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

No mention of atheism
Jesus you are really covering up for the atheists 109.240.98.232 (talk) 12:47, 7 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The fact he's an atheist would contradict the ludicrous cult narrative which the leftists and nihilists are pushing to slander him. 2A01:5A8:447:A861:917D:3E97:8AE8:72C (talk) 06:14, 15 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Uh huh, "slander", sure. Regardless, without a reliable sources, who cares whether or not he's an atheist? If you have a reliable source for this, and that source indicates why it matters, feel free to propose it. Grayfell (talk) 06:19, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 28 June 2024
Put in somewhere “he appears on freedomainradio often with his daughter in a condescending demeanor to his call-in guests…”. And “he milks donations out of listeners and complains if his tips are of a dollar or less…” 2603:6011:4301:7094:2DBA:D539:24D:6936 (talk) 04:01, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
 * May well be OR and way to much editorialising. Slatersteven (talk) 10:02, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: unsourced, non-neutral Wracking  talk! 15:05, 28 June 2024 (UTC)