Talk:Steffan O'Sullivan

Merger Discussion
This article should be merged with FUDGE as the subject fails notability guideline WP:BIO. --Gavin Collins 09:31, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

From WP:BIO: "*Creative professionals: scientists, academics, economists, professors, authors, editors, journalists, filmmakers, photographers, artists, architects, engineers, and other creative professionals."

He is an established author, so let's proceed from there. Check out Fudge (role-playing game). Specifically, Fudge (role-playing game). I believe this discounts your notability argument. Turlo Lomon 12:37, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory or technique.
 * The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, which has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.
 * I also want to add that Bunnies and Burrows is also notable, as proven in that article. This supports the second clause I copied above. Turlo Lomon 15:35, 11 September 2007 (UTC)


 * As you know, notability is not inherited. This article is too short to demonstrate notability. If the concept, theory or technique was notable, its should follow that there would be a large body of work supporting the claim to notability. I see no evidence of this, although it is always possible that I am mistaken. However, I still propose merger. --Gavin Collins 09:34, 24 September 2007 (UTC)