Talk:Steinberg v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.

Untitled
The past reversions had a section "Did the court get it right?", which with the contents seemed (IMAO) to be inappropraite original research on the legal basis, atleast with that phrasing. Tagged for someone better at formatting to give it a pretty courtcase box, etc. 68.39.174.238 01:56, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Template original research removed because as it stands the article just recites what is in the published opinion. A Criticism section might be appropriate citing law reviews and other courts who have considered similar issues. Signed: Bejnar 18:59, 5 August 2006 (UTC)