Talk:Steinhöfel

Re-evaluate quality?
Article may qualify for a slightly higher quality and importance rating to date.

Links to due process are escaping me at the moment.

--217.81.163.66 (talk) 12:22, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

What technical "miracle" is overriding the figures from the info box
... to read a population of "4322" while in the box source data it is given as "4657" ?

Even more curious, I can seem to find neither "4,322" nor "4322" or "322" anywhere in the source.

Same with the date related to it - "31.12.2012" rendered in the box as opposed to "2006-06-30" in the box source.

Help??

Reported this at the Village Pump (Tech section) a minuted ago.

--217.81.163.66 (talk) 12:41, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Reply moved to Village pump (technical) to avoid having a split discussion -- Red rose64 (talk) 13:40, 2 August 2013 (UTC)