Talk:Stella Ross-Craig

Untitled
The timeline doesn't make sense; if she was born in 1906, she would have been 96 or 97 when she had her exhibition.
 * That's about right. She was 95 for the first one, although she couldn't attend. A case of better late than never. FlowerpotmaN &middot;( t ) 19:41, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Wonderful work. Unless I am going crazy, I seem to remember seeing a show of her work in the gallery at Kew in the late 1990s. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.104.113.175 (talk) 20:19, 18 March 2014 (UTC)