Talk:Stephanie Peacock

Requested move 23 May 2018

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasu よ! 18:27, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Stephanie Peacock (politician) → Stephanie Peacock – Even with a 1-year head start, the swimmer was never receiving much traffic to begin with.|Stephanie_Peacock_(swimmer)|Stephanie_Peacock_(politician) Unreal7 (talk) 12:37, 23 May 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. — usernamekiran (talk)  17:44, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Political figure with with no international renown. Not WP:PRIMARYTOPIC.   Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 01:17, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Oppose WP:NOPRIMARY per above. Primary topic isn't just about page stats (else we could automate that), but also requires some showing of long-term significance. -- Netoholic @ 22:58, 1 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 23 September 2019

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Moved, as the politician is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. (non-admin closure) Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:51, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Stephanie Peacock (politician) → Stephanie Peacock – Same with Ian Austin. I made the request last year, but it's clear as day that the MP is far more notable than the swimmer.|Stephanie_Peacock_(politician)|Stephanie_Peacock_(swimmer) Unreal7 (talk) 09:31, 23 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Support per nom. Of the two people with this name the politician is clearly the primary topic in terms of |Stephanie_Peacock_(politician)|Stephanie_Peacock_(swimmer) usage. Neither "international renown" or "long-term significance" (reasons cited in the last discussion) are necessary here. PC78 (talk) 17:24, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose per arguments in the previous discussion. All two-person disambiguation pages list one person who has more views than the other person, but if the person with the greater number has no demonstrable international renown or long-term significance, then the higher number of views alone should not be an instant pathway to WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 23:46, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Neither of those are WP:PRIMARYTOPIC requirements. PC78 (talk) 02:19, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
 * All aspects of each individual nomination are examined on a case-by-case basis. Entries for recently-elected legislators, with no additional claims to notability, are frequently accessed per aptly-named WP:RECENT but, by that standard, all new MPs would advance to primary topics. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 02:47, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If you're suggesting "recentism" as a factor then that would also have to apply to the swimmer, who has no greater claim to "long-term notability" (or significance, for that matter) than the politician. WP:PRIMARYTOPIC does not set a higher bar for elected officials. PC78 (talk) 03:23, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Recentism is indeed at the heart of the creation of both articles. The swimmer's entry was AfD-nominated and deleted in 2014, but recreated in 2016, following her medal wins. Likewise, the MP's entry along with the dab page was created in 2017, following her election. No one is questioning the long-term notability of either woman since Wikipedia strives to list all MPs and all medalists. Neither Stephanie Peacock, however, has accumulated sufficient international spotlight for advancement to primary over the other one. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 03:59, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. and more notable. Futebul (talk) 23:59, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Support. Over 97% of readers are looking for the politician. The other 3% get to the swimmer as easily through a hatnote as through a dab page. Station1 (talk) 19:35, 25 September 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Council bungalow ramp for disabled
Hello Stephanie, my name is Sharron Foley , We need a ramp for our bungalow to be able to go to the shops etc , I have COPD and my partner Allan Stanley has Parkinson’s , we have asked the council but all they say is that it’s not possible , however some neighbours have got ramps , we have steps but so do others with ramps , please help 92.7.179.240 (talk) 14:48, 5 January 2022 (UTC)