Talk:Stephen Bradbury (artist)

Proposed deletion
This article is totally unsuitable for wikipedia in its present form and if it isn't improved in the next few days I will be proposing that it is deleted for the following reasons: Richerman (talk) 23:17, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * It appears to have been written for promotional purposes, probably by the artist himself or someone closely connected to him as there are no references and there is a link to a personal website that has not yet been created. see wp:COI and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons
 * It is not not written in a neutral style see wp:NPOV.
 * The notability of the person has not been established as the information given is not referenced see: wp:notability.

The article was not written for promotional reasons. Stephen Bradbury is an award winning artist, whose work has appeared on book covers around the World. His work ties in with many notable authors who have had Wiki articles written about them, and the David J. Howe article on Wiki.
 * References have now been included. As for style etc.
 * This is my first article for Wiki. It's a learning curve. I've made it more neutral, and stuck with the facts and not mentioned future, or impending events. Isn't Wikipedia about others contributing to articles once you get the ball rolling and editing and refining them ! I naively thought that's what would happen.
 * All the information can be verified, by following the references, now put in place.
 * Links to the Stephen Bradbury website have been removed. Not sure what the difficulty was there.
 * Having read many other articles on Wikipedia of far less notable people, and far worse literally styled, it doesn't seem right to delete this article about one of our country's leading illustrators and notable Mancunian.
 * However, I obviously have to bow to your judgement, but hope that enough has been done to stop this article being considered for deletion.

(Spopland (talk) 23:54, 10 May 2011 (UTC))


 * I'm sure there is room on wikipedia for an article about this person but I seem to be missing something here. Where does all the information in the Biography of Stephen Bradbury come from? Does it come from Reflections: The Fantasy Art of Stephen Bradbury? If so it needs in line references with page numbers. There are strict rules about biographies of living persons and all information in them has to be verifiable - otherwise it may be libellous. Richerman (talk) 00:30, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

I've made the article more neutral and stuck to the facts.
 * Reflections is a major source, as is magazine and press articles from the 90's. I can add reference for these. David J. Howe, who was commissioned by Paper Tiger to write the Reflections book in 1996 has looked at the Wiki article and verified it's authenticity. Hence, my acknowledging him in the reference section. He's obviously, probably, the most knowledgable person, on the artist.  There is no libellous elements in the article.
 * The Locus reference verifies most of the titles mentioned in the article.
 * Typing in Stephen Bradbury Artist on the web brings up sufficient sites and interest in the artist around the globe, to merit this article, and the suitability of being considered a notable person.
 * Sorry if I cocked it up, with my chummy writing style, I know in future to stick to the facts and a neutral style. This Wiki thing is new to me. The guidelines for writing Wiki aren't that easy to follow. I'm trying my best !

(Spopland (talk) 01:06, 11 May 2011 (UTC))


 * There's no need to apologise - I'm just another editor who has been doing this longer than you. I appreciate it's not easy so I'll post a welcome message on your user page which may help point you in the right direction. However, one of the major pillars of wikipedia is the first sentence in the guideline wp:verifiability - "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth—whether readers can check that material in Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether editors think it is true." Also wp:no original research is applicable. Saying that someone has looked at the Wiki article and verified it's authenticity is not good enough as no-one can check that. All statements made must be verifiable by others - particularly in a biography of a living person. Richerman (talk) 09:28, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, for your advice and guidance. To be honest I didn't realise it was going to be so hard. (Spopland (talk) 09:48, 11 May 2011 (UTC)) As you said, facts are what is needed, not just verification by a person. Many thanks for your help and guidance.
 * During the 1980's and 90's, there was a golden age of British Science fiction and fantasy illustration. British artists like Stephen Bradbury, along with Roger Dean, Rodney Mathews, Chris Foss, Jim Burns,Geoff Taylor, et al, led the World in this field. Stephen Bradbury, was an obvious target to write something about for Wiki, with others to follow. ( I haven't got off to a good start) There has been a huge resurgence of interest of interest lately in his work and the other artists mentioned. Images of his work are appearing on the net more and more, from the period I mentioned.
 * Speculation, as to what the artist has been doing over the last decade has been growing.
 * The Facets book by Bradbury. ISBN 978-0-9568864-0-8. Nielson UK ISBN Agency, brings the article and biography up to date.
 * Just added references from magazine, newspaper and radio articles about the artist. All the biographical details about Bradbury in my Wiki article are within these articles.

(Spopland (talk) 10:40, 11 May 2011 (UTC))


 * OK that's a good start but if you want to do it properly you really need to link each fact to a reference. If you don't do that someone will probably put a tag on the article like the ones that have already been added. If you look at a short biographical article like Don Estelle you can see how it's done. If you are going to use the same sources a number of times there are a couple of ways of doing that. If you just put them in as duplicates for now I'll show you how to sort them out. Oh, and the reason why you've got those strange dotted boxes above is because you've left a space at the beginning of the line - delete the space and they'll disappear. Richerman (talk) 13:58, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Just looked at Don Estelle. I will do my best. I've looked people's articles for some of the artists I mentioned. Chris Moore, Jim Burns, Roger Dean. The articles appear a bit shambolic. If you want to contribute to these articles, how does somebody like me or anybody else add to them. After my experience on this article, I'm not sure I'd have the confidence. Adding a sentence here and there maybe. Anyway, for now thank you ver much for your advice and mentoring. (Spopland (talk) 15:20, 11 May 2011 (UTC)) (Spopland (talk) 19:20, 11 May 2011 (UTC))
 * Could you tell me how you actually make the little bracketed numbers ?


 * Please don't be put off. I'm sorry if I was rather heavy handed at first - I should have realised you were a new editor. To add inline references (the bracketed numbers) first put the cursor where you want the reference to go and click. At the top of the editing window you will see some curly brackets - if you hover over them it says "insert citation". If you click on them it comes up with a number of options: cite book, cite web etc. Choose the one you want and fill in as many of the boxes as you can. If you are going to use that source more than once it helps if you fill in a short name for the reference in the "reference name" box (I'll explain about that later). When you've done click "insert citation" and then save the page. That should put in the bracketed number automatically and the reference will appear in the references section. As you add more they will each get their own number automatically. By the way, that section was better as the bulleted list you had originally so I've changed it back. The inline and other references will need to be split up but that can be done later. To edit other articles just click on edit and make your changes. You can reword any badly worded sections etc. but be sure to add a reference for any new facts you add. Then add the article to your watchlist and see what happens. Start off making small changes and see if they stick or get reverted by someone. If you want to experiment with how things work use the sandbox Richerman (talk) 22:58, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

The new arranged reference list looks good. Thank you. I can see that I made the initial mistake, probably like many new editors do, of writing in a journalistic way. Completely forgetting, that Wiki is an encyclopaedia, which just demands the facts, without embellishments etc. I will try and do as you say and put in the reference numbers. At the moment, I think I've been on a massive learning curve, the last few days. (Spopland (talk) 23:37, 11 May 2011 (UTC))
 * You seem to be getting there now - just a couple of things to bear in mind. When you make an edit you should fill in the edit summary box each time with a short description of what you've done so others can see what the changes are. It's perhaps not so important on this article at the moment as there is only you working on it (although it's good practice anyway) but if you edit any other articles it does tend to wind people up if you don't give a summary as they have to read through a load of text to find out what you've changed. Also, when you reply to a post on a talk page you should indent your reply so it's clear who has written which bit. To do that, the first reply begins with a colon the next with two colons and so on. And as to what you said above - yes, a lot of the biography articles are shambolic as people tend to add in bits of information here and there without too much thought. You'll find there is endless scope for improving articles as you get more confident with editing. Have fun! Richerman (talk) 23:12, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Requested move
The title to this page should be Stephen Bradbury (Artist). Although Bradbury is mainly working on fine art projects these days, most searches on the web are usually channeled via search engines to Stephen Bradbury Artist. Spopland (talk) 23:27, 28 August 2013 (UTC)


 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 23:11, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Stephen Bradbury (painter) → Stephen Bradbury (artist) – I place the move request for Spopland. I support his suggestion except that the "artist" should be lowercased. Neo-Jay (talk) 01:56, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.