Talk:Stephen Court fire/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Yashthepunisher (talk) 08:19, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

I'll review this soon. Yashthepunisher (talk) 08:19, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Comments Yashthepunisher (talk) 11:26, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * "The Stephen Court fire was a major fire in a historical building.." Which building?
 * I believe the name 'Calcutta' was during the Britishers, now its 'Kolkata'.
 * You can also mention the states name in the lead and infobox.
 * "A delay in the start of rescue operations was experienced due to inadequate planning." A 'the' is missing somewhere.
 * How many people were their on the floors? Were there any injured people who survived?
 * The second sentence in the 'Original construction' section seems too long. try splitting it into two.
 * "The civic authorities slapped a notice of building code violation on the building's management authorities." Slapped a notice seems informal, kindly rephrase it.
 * regularized --> regularised. Indian english.
 * "Further investigation revealed a lack of maintenance of the electrical circuitry leading to exposed live wires in the basement, and the wooden main stairs made the building a tinderbox." This sentence should be placed after the incident is mentioned in the article's body.
 * Provide alt text for the image.
 * Link IST in the lead.
 * "In 2016, an unregistered company took the initiative of restoring the heritage building to its former glory." Any name of the company? Also the 'former glory' seems POV-ish.

Source review Yashthepunisher (talk) 11:39, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Archive ref 6.
 * www.telegraphindia.com --> The Telegraph
 * dna --> Daily News and Analysis
 * NDTV.com --> NDTV
 * Date missing from ref 6.
 * Ref 9 is missing author and date.
 * NDTV Convergence Limited --> NDTV
 * Sify Technologies Ltd --> Sify
 * Link the publishers on their first instance and delink them elsewhere.
 * ✅ mostly. There are only two problems:
 * Ref 6 won't archive (I even went to archive.org but found that the snapshots preserved were redirecting to a non-existent page.
 * The number of residents living in those floors are quoted differently by different leading dailies (Times of India:300,The Hindu:101,The Telegraph:70) since I could not come to a decision as to which source to use, I decided against adding that information altogether.

All the other comments have been implemented smoothly — FR+ 10:14, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

The article is in fine shape and meets the GA criteria's IMO. Great work. Pass Yashthepunisher (talk) 12:16, 13 March 2018 (UTC)