Talk:Stephen II of Hungary/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: 3family6 (talk · contribs) 00:59, 14 June 2014 (UTC)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * The following images are tagged as needing a US public domain tag:, , ,
 * The following image is tagged as needing a US public domain tag, and lacks author information:
 * , thank you for your review. Sorry, I am not an expert in the field of US copyright law and cannot fix the above problem. Neither do I have information on the authorship of the picture. Borsoka (talk) 07:44, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Looking at the information, the illustrations should easily be in US public domain, since they are centuries old. Therefore, I think it would be okay if I went ahead and added the tag. I'll also mark the one picture without author info as "anonymous."-- &iquest;3fam  ily6  contribs 12:18, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * The following images are tagged as needing a US public domain tag:, , ,
 * The following image is tagged as needing a US public domain tag, and lacks author information:
 * , thank you for your review. Sorry, I am not an expert in the field of US copyright law and cannot fix the above problem. Neither do I have information on the authorship of the picture. Borsoka (talk) 07:44, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Looking at the information, the illustrations should easily be in US public domain, since they are centuries old. Therefore, I think it would be okay if I went ahead and added the tag. I'll also mark the one picture without author info as "anonymous."-- &iquest;3fam  ily6  contribs 12:18, 14 June 2014 (UTC)


 * 1) Overall: Other than these few minor image issues, the article is good to go.-- &iquest;3fam  ily6  contribs 00:59, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Issues resolved, article passed-- &iquest;3fam  ily6  contribs 12:58, 14 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Pass/Fail: