Talk:Stereology

I noticed that these 2 web sites had been removed from the links section. The Stereology Information Center web site has a message that says that they were down for a while, but they're back up now. So, I'm adding them back in. The MBF Bioscience page points to a stereology-related web site, and it looks like it was removed by someone who has a competing product, so I'm adding it back in. Thanks!

20:00, 10 July 2007 209.198.74.66 This history entry is an IP belonging to MBF at 8PM deleting a competing link. This is the second time this has been done by MBF.

PaddBear is obviously Steve Arrants at MBF and should be careful of any allegations they make. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.175.154.212 (talk) 18:49, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

I hope someone can fill out the references. I want to know where that fact about the structure of the liver came from. Mllyjn (talk) 14:32, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

The structure of the mammalian liver is a well known example of misinterpretation of microscopy images. I suggest reading articles by Elias to learn more about this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.171.20.9 (talk) 20:10, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

The recent link did not contain any useful information about defining stereology. It was an advertisement page for a commercial interest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.171.20.9 (talk) 20:14, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20150228042532/http://stereologysociety.org/about.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Sam-2727 (talk) 04:00, 26 July 2020 (UTC)