Talk:Steve Kirsch/Archive 2

Arbitrary?
In reference to the COVID-19 Early Treatment fund, how exactly is it arbitrary to expand the article with high-profile examples of the donors? I fail to see how this is either "link spamming" or "arbitrary" as was alleged in the reversion to my edit. It's clearly already part of the article, and the donors I added are all notable. I request further elaboration. Liaton9000 (talk) 00:26, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
 * They might be notable but not to this article, notable to the fund if that had an article. They are not specific to this WP:BLP and its a clear WP:NPOV as they are randomly choosen, supposedely high-profile indidivuals - name choosen from the list itself, out a list of 40-50 odd. They don't add anything to the article as they are specific to the fund and not Kirsch himself. I think it also slightly promotional. Why did you choose these names?   scope_creep Talk  00:38, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Okay, I can live with that. Thanks for explaining - though the list of donors is significantly smaller than 40-50. I selected those names as they were the ones that already had their own pages. Liaton9000 (talk) 01:05, 11 January 2023 (UTC)